A literature review in methodology ensures that it:
There are different types of literature reviews, depending on the research methodology adopted:
| Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Narrative Review | Provides a broad overview of existing research without a systematic approach. |
| Systematic Review | It uses a structured method to analyze and synthesize existing studies, minimizing bias (Booth et al., 2016). |
| Meta-Analysis | Combines statistical data from multiple studies to identify patterns and trends. |
| Scoping Review | Explores the extent of available literature on a topic without assessing study quality. |
| Theoretical Review | Examines theories and conceptual models related to the research topic. |
There are four main components of a literature review:
It depends on the study level—10-20 sources for a research paper, 30-50 for a master’s thesis, and 100+ for a PhD dissertation (Booth et al., 2016).
An effective literature review is well-structured, critically analyzes sources, and identifies research gaps.
A literature review summarizes and analyzes prior research, while a theoretical framework provides a structured explanation of concepts relevant to the study.
A literature review in research methodology is crucial to academic writing, providing the foundation for scholarly work. Understanding its purpose, types, and structure ensures a comprehensive and well-supported study.
To contribute valuable insights to their field, researchers must critically evaluate sources, organize themes effectively, and identify gaps.
Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Sage.
Ridley, D. (2012). The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students. SAGE Publications.