Both platforms provide access to high-quality scholarly literature, enable citation tracking, support research evaluation, and help identify collaborators and emerging trends.

Although they serve similar purposes, Scopus and Web of Science differ significantly in coverage, selection criteria, search tools, metrics, and historical depth.

Understanding these differences is essential for researchers who wish to choose the right platform for literature reviews, academic publishing decisions, or institutional research assessments.

Table of Contents

What Are Scopus and Web of Science?

Scopus (Elsevier)

Scopus, launched in 2004 by Elsevier, is an extensive multidisciplinary database covering more than 43,000 active journals, conference proceedings, patents, and book series.

It prioritizes breadth, global coverage, and user-friendly tools, making it especially valuable for early-career researchers who need intuitive search, citation mapping, and automated author profiles.

Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics)

Web of Science (WoS), initially the Science Citation Index created by Eugene Garfield in the 1960s, focuses on curated, high-influence journals through its Core Collection, which includes around 22,000 journals.

WoS is often associated with research prestige due to its selective inclusion criteria and the long-standing influence of the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) derived from its indexing.

Scopus vs Web of Science

Scopus vs Web of Science: Key Differences

5 Key Differences

1. Coverage and Breadth

Scopus

Scopus is known for its breadth—it includes:

This makes Scopus ideal for comprehensive literature reviews, interdisciplinary research, and emerging fields.

Web of Science

WoS uses a highly selective curation process through its Master Journal List (MJL). Journals undergo rigorous evaluation for:

This selectivity contributes to its reputation for high-impact scholarship.

2. Content Types

Scopus Includes:

Web of Science Includes:

3. Search and Analytical Features

Scopus Strengths

Web of Science Strengths

4. Metrics: CiteScore vs Journal Impact Factor

This is one of the most commonly misunderstood areas for students.

Scopus Metrics

These metrics are more inclusive and considered more field-normalized.

Journal Impact Factor (Web of Science – Clarivate JCR)

5. Historical Depth

Comparison Table – Scopus vs Web of Science

FeatureScopusWeb of Science (Core Collection)
OwnerElsevierClarivate Analytics
FocusBreadth and comprehensive global coverageSelective, high-influence journals
Journal Coverage43,000+ active journals22,000+ journals
Discipline StrengthStrong across sciences, medicine, social sciences, arts & humanitiesStrong in natural sciences; selective in humanities & social sciences
Non-English LiteratureSuperior international and regional coverageLower; requires English abstracts
Cited ReferencesBack to 1970Selective records back to 1900
Key MetricsCiteScore, SJR, SNIP, h-indexJournal Impact Factor (JIF), JCI, h-index

Which Database Is Better?

Choose Scopus if you want:

Choose Web of Science if you want:

Most institutions use both because each fills gaps left by the other.

How to Verify a Journal’s Indexing Status

Scopus

Use the official Scopus Sources tool:
https://www.scopus.com/sources
Search by:

Web of Science

Use the Master Journal List (MJL):
https://mjl.clarivate.com/search
Check:

Recommended reads:

How To Check Scopus-Indexed Journals: Step-By-Step

7 Free Scopus-Indexed Journals Fast Publication

FAQs

Is Scopus better than Web of Science?

Not necessarily—Scopus is broader, WoS is more selective. The better database depends on your literature review needs.

Which indexing system is more prestigious?

Web of Science is often viewed as more prestigious due to the JIF ecosystem, but Scopus metrics like SJR also carry strong credibility.

How do I know if my target journal is indexed in Scopus or WoS?

Search the ISSN in the official Scopus Sources database or WoS Master Journal List.

Does Scopus have an Impact Factor?

No. Impact Factor is exclusive to Clarivate (WoS). Scopus offers CiteScore, SJR, and SNIP.

Conclusion

Scopus and Web of Science are essential tools for academic research, but they serve different purposes and audiences. Scopus excels in broad global coverage, ease of use, and international inclusivity, while Web of Science offers a highly curated set of influential journals with unmatched historical depth.

For PhD students and early-career researchers, understanding these differences can improve literature search strategies, enhance journal selection decisions, and strengthen research evaluation practices.

Ideally, researchers should use both systems to gain the fullest possible view of the scholarly landscape.

References

Scroll to Top
Review Your Cart
0
Add Coupon Code
Subtotal